BY EMAIL

June 23, 2006

E-mail from Karl Keintz Eisbrenner M.A. (Oxon.); L.L.B:

... something to think about...

Subject: Manifest Destiny + Hitler's Lebensraum

Manifest Destiny became a disputed philosophy. The following are two examples of the different views of the American people. This is evidence of the opposing attitudes towards the Manifest Destiny ideology.

In a 1837 letter to Henry Clay, William E. Channing wrote: "Did this county know itself, or were it disposed to profit by self-knowledge, it would feel the necessity of laying an immediate curb on its passion for extended territory.... We are a restless people, prone to encroachment, impatient of the ordinary laws of progress...

We boast of our rapid growth, forgetting that, throughout nature, noble growths are slow..... It is full time that we should lay on ourselves serious, resolute restraint.

Possessed of a domain, vast enough for the growth of ages, it is time for us to stop in the career of acquisition and conquest. Already endangered by our greatness, we cannot advance without imminent peril to our institutions, union, prosperity, virtue, and peace.....

It is sometimes said, that nations are swayed by laws, as unfailing as those which govern matter; that they have their destinies; that their character and position carry them forward irresistibly to their goal;.... that ... the Indians have melted before the white man, and the mixed, degraded race of Mexico must melt before the Anglo-Saxon.

Away with this vile sophistry! There is no necessity for crime. There is no fate to justify rapacious nations, any more than to justify gamblers and robbers, in plunder. We boast of the progress of society, and this progress consists in the substitution of reason and moral principle for the sway of brute force....

We talk of accomplishing our destiny. So did the late conqueror of Europe (Napoleon); and destiny consigned him to a lonely rock in the ocean, the prey of ambition which destroyed no peace but his own"

(Blum 276)

As an example of the opposing attitude and the attitude that was voiced by the majority of Americans at the time, the following article appeared in the Democratic Review in 1845. "Texas has been absorbed into the Union in the inevitable fulfillment of the general law which is rolling our population westward....

It was disintegrated form Mexico in the natural course of events, by a process perfectly legitimate on its own part, blameless on ours....

(its)incorporation into the Union was not only inevitable, but the most natural, right and proper thing in the world....

California will, probably, next fall away from...Mexico....

Imbecile and distracted, Mexico never can exert any real governmental authority over such a country....

The Anglo-Saxon foot is already on its borders. Already the advance guard of the irresistible army of Anglo-Saxon emigration has begun to pour down upon it armed with the plow and the rifle, and markings its trail with schools and colleges, courts and representative halls, mills and meeting houses.

A population will soon be in actual occupation of California, over which it will be idle for Mexico to dream of dominion...

All this without agency of our government, without responsibility of our people --in natural flow of events, the spontaneous working of principles, and the adaptation of the tendencies and wants of the human race to the elemental circumstances in the midst of which they find themselves placed."